Free energy can be directly made from gravitation; because a small mass can acquire all the motion contained in a large mass. And the small mass can return all the motion back to the larger mass.
The Dawn Mission de-spin mechanism is a good example; less than 3 kilograms (of thrown masses) acquires all the spinning motion of the 1400 kilograms satellite.
It has been proven that if the thrown masses had been left attached; they would restart the full spin of the satellite. Only linear Newtonian momentum has enough motion to return the spin of the satellite.
Because the small masses have the linear Newtonian momentum; the energy increase is massive. Production of a massive quantity of free energy would involve a combination of a few simple machines.
An object with five times as much momentum has twenty five times as much energy. A one kilogram mass that is dropped one meter in free fall has 4.429 units of linear Newtonian momentum. A one kilogram mass dropped one meter in a 25 to one Atwood’s has five times that much momentum; at: square root of (1 m * 2 * 9.81/25) = v: v * 25 kilograms = momentum; 22.147 units. If a one kilogram mass has this much momentum it will rise 25 meters; and it was only dropped one meter. The Atwood’s can give all of its momentum to the one kilogram mass by use of the cylinder and spheres device (or the Dawn Mission de-spin event). The larger the Atwood’s the greater the energy produced: and a chain drive Atwood’s would multiply the affect.
Only a fraction of the momentum, produced, is needed to reload an imbalanced rim. Sixteen kilograms dropped one meter will produce 70.68 units (4.429 m/sec * 16 kg) of momentum; only 17.718 (d = ½ v²/a) units are needed to reload the rim. With a velocity of 17.718 an object will rise 16 meters. But the energy difference is 16 to 1: 70.68² / 17.718²; only a minimal percentage of energy is needed to bring the system back to the starting point. The excess free energy can be used to produce electricity. The cylinder and spheres machines proves that the momentum of a very massive object can be given to a small mass. The energy increase is massive. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaUmzekdxTQ
Good news, I'm a new member with the name gs.Serving an idea and I want you to check it out here. I have designed a magnet clipboard on the paper two types of energy source to make a job. the gravity of the gravity and the magnet,which is useful for lifting a magnet rotor one meter up in the sky then she uses the berry and he lurks with power at his entrance gun magnet to break the barrage and create a work circle.... I'm a beginner and my first project please let me know if this engine has been hoping to work. thanks in advance g.s
eljko Milkovic invented a mechanical device which outputs more work than it takes to run it.
It is so simple to build that there are many replications all over the world and it is spreading fast - for the last several years.
This is yet another device, which defeats the equal and opposite reaction requirement - similar to the Fernando Sixto Ramos Solano Force Multiplier. The reaction in this machine helps to produce work in the forward direction instead of countering the input. It's mechanical jujitsu.
There is a new website they put together - Welcome to the World of Pendulum Power - Veljko Milkovic's Two-Stage Mechanical Oscillator - Official presentation
The old site is still there: Veljko Milkovic - Home Page - Official presentation of the researcher and inventor Veljko Milkovic
Mechanical Oscillator - The Pendulum-Lever System - A Mechanical Amplifier of Clean Energy -
Free Mechanical Energy Device
A simple mechanism with new mechanical effects, represents the source of clean mechanical energy. This gravity machine has only two main parts: a massive lever and a pendulum. The interaction of the two-stage lever multiplies input energy into output energy convenient for useful work (mechanical hammer, press, pump, transmission, electric generator...).
Mechanical hammer with a pendulum
1 - anvil, 2 - massive lever, 3 - lever axel, 4 - physical pendulum The creator, inventor and constructor of the two-stage mechanical oscillator and the author of the related patents is academician Veljko Milkovic -- a Serbian internationally awarded researcher and inventor being interested in past events, ecological innovations and new clean technologies. During his successful research career, he created around 114 inventions and got 29 granted patents some of which have been in use for years.
For Newtonian momentum to be conserved, when the spheres have all the motion, the spheres increase in velocity must be proportional to the ratio of the total mass over the sphere mass. In this experiment that velocity would be a little over 5.0 m/sec.
For energy to be conserved, when the spheres have all the motion, the spheres increase in velocity must be the square root of the proportion of the ratio of the total mass over the sphere mass. In this experiment that velocity would be about 2.46 m/sec.
When a small mass (spheres) gives its motion to a large mass (cylinder and spheres) Newtonian momentum is always conserved and energy is never conserved.
The motion in the experiment is given back, from the spheres, twice: linear Newtonian momentum is being conserved but not energy.
It takes (19 frames) to go from 1.2 m/sec of rotation to the first stop of the cylinder. It takes the same amount of time (19 frames) to go from the last stop to the last full quantity of rotational motion. This motion appears to be the same (1.2 m/sec); from counting the frames (4) needed to cross the black square. The 19 frames confirms that it is indeed the same. Because it would be moving about a fourth that fast (83 frames) if energy was conserved and the alleged heat was lost.
If energy were conserved there would be about a 50% heat loss between frames 160 and 179; and between 197 and 216.
If energy were conserved there would be about a 50% motion loss between frames 141 and 160; and between 179 and 197.
They kicked me off the other site. (B) asked why I keep posting.
(B) You don't mention the cylinder and spheres machines that start with a four frames crossings of the square and end with a four frame crossing of the square. These machine confirm that motion is conserved throughout the entire experiment. In between these two crossing is all the motion being conserved by two small spheres. Energy conservation would have you drop down to a fractional portion of the momentum (for the spheres) and magically bring it all back. This magic doesn’t happen: momentum is conserved throughout and the spheres have all the momentum. The spheres do not conserve the kinetic energy.
Kinetic energy can not be transferred from small object to large object. Ballistic pendulums have proven this for hundreds of years.
There is no mechanism by which the conservation of motion (four squares to four squares) can be achieved by the cylinder and spheres machines other than conservation of linear Newtonian momentum. If half the experiment uses linear Newtonian momentum then the other half has to use linear Newtonian momentum. If small masses can only share linear Newtonian with large masses; then large masses sharing with small masses can share only linear Newtonian. You simply have no choice.
Once it was shown that the spheres of the dawn mission despin would restart the satellite spinning then NASA's prediction of 20 units of momentum causing 400 units is patently ridiculous.
Rotating objects tend to rotate about their center of mass; which includes the experiment (one sphere experiment) you are looking at (B). You have evaluated only half of the experiment but have found 100% enough energy. And air resistance eats up energy just like it eats up momentum. You should not have one hundred present left.
I have stated that I have measured energy increases for a long time. You just don't accept the measurements. Or repeat the experiments.
The above site has a drawing of a Galileo's pendulum. Designate the top of that drawing as point A.
Angular momentum conservation is often used to negate Newtonian Momentum Conservation. A look at Galileo's pendulum proves that Angular Momentum Conservation (in the lab) is a false concept.
Added comments by Delburt Phend on conservation:
Let length A-C equal 1.00 meter.
Let length E-G equal .500 meters.
Let the length of the drop (H) equal .31855 meters.
The velocity at the bottom of the swing is therefore 2.5 m/sec.
Let the mass of the bob equal 1 kilogram.
At the down swing position the Newtonian Momentum (MV) for the pendulum of length A-C is 2.5.
At the down swing position the Newtonian Momentum for the pendulum of length E-G is 2.5.
At the down swing position the Kinetic Energy (1/2MV²) for the pendulum of length A-C is 3.125 J.
At the down swing position the Kinetic Energy for the pendulum of length E-G is 3.125 J.
At the down swing position the Angular Momentum (MVL) for the pendulum of length A-C is 2.5.
At the down swing position the Angular Momentum for the pendulum of length E-G is 1.25.
In this experiment Kinetic Energy and Newtonian Momentum are conserved: Angular Momentum is not conserved.