Not signed in (Sign In)

Vanilla 1.1.7 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.


    •  
      CommentAuthortesla23
    • CommentTimeMay 14th 2012
     
    all the members who notice this topic please share any ideas... good, bad, stupid, brilliant, it doesnt matter... pls save the world.... because the corpocrats are not gona let the plans go public
    •  
      CommentAuthorolliy
    • CommentTimeJul 6th 2012
     
    check this out. It's a start. it's something at least.  
     
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lhDSF9fXzY&feature=plcp
  1.  
    ok the magnetic perptual motor wat gives seemz simple in thorey a machine that orbits a central pull like our planet.....? does wat if u set up a desing with magnets like a crop circle size an shape scaled wit all tpe magnets avalible ?>??? in diff combination;s.
    •  
      CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2013
     
    •  
      CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeMar 28th 2013
     
    •  
      CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeMar 30th 2013
     
    Yes, is everywhere, but it too is difficult to use.. see this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4KRc6xghqk
    •  
      CommentAuthorexchemist
    • CommentTimeMay 1st 2013
     
    No. It's not possible.  
     
    And it is not the corporations that stop it, it is just the laws of physics. Do you think Clausius, Thomson and Carnot were in the pay of Exxon or something, back in the 2nd half of the c.19th?  
     
    Expend effort on new sources of energy by all means, but not on trying to get something for nothing - it's futile.
    •  
      CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeMay 1st 2013
     
    Yes i think it is possible.
    The 4 laws of thermodynamics are only applicable in a closed system, not in a halfopen system.
    •  
      CommentAuthorexchemist
    • CommentTimeMay 1st 2013
     
    Well yes, but if the "system" (whatever it is you have in mind) is "half-open" then it mean the energy is coming from somewhere so is not "free".  
     
    The fact is that for any system, open or closed, if you correctly analyse the energy inputs and outputs they will always balance.
    •  
      CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2013
     
    The energy is free because the output can be greater as the input and the source of input itselve will be never greater than 100%
    It is something like this :

    F0 = seropoint of forces
    ^ F+ F+ = positive force
    | F- = negative force
    | ML-F = mirrorline of forces
    | F-' Frest = restforce for driving the cycle into infinty
    F0 . <------- |
    | |
    | | ML-F
    |--------- |----------
    | ^
    | |
    | | Frest
    V F- V
    ----------------------------
    •  
      CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2013
     
    This schema looks like sh*t, a better one you can find here @ http://82.73.250.8
    •  
      CommentAuthorexchemist
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2013
     
    Regarding this "explanation":  
     
    QUOTE  
     
    The energy is free because the output can be greater as the input and the source of input itselve will be never greater than 100%  
    It is something like this :  
     
    F0 = seropoint of forces  
    ^ F+ F+ = positive force  
    | F- = negative force  
    | ML-F = mirrorline of forces  
    | F-' Frest = restforce for driving the cycle into infinty  
    F0 . <------- |  
    | |  
    | | ML-F  
    |--------- |----------  
    | ^  
    | |  
    | | Frest  
    V F- V  
    ----------------------------  
     
    UNQUOTE  
     
    This is not at all clear. For a start, why do you talk about "forces", when we are supposed to be discussing an energy balance? Work is Force x distance over which the force is exerted, but you say nothing about any distance.  
     
    Can you explain further please, or is this just woo-woo rubbish?
    •  
      CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeMay 2nd 2013
     
    If you put kinetic energy on a surface it gives a force, this is the basis of physics.
    Force = Mass x Length . The distance is not relevant, F= M x L, set a 1 kilo on 1meter of length or 2 kilos on 0,5 meters of length , it has the same force.

    Just because i can, some metaphysics, lol;
    Take the volume of the whole atmosphere around of earth & set it 1, there are still low and highpressure fronts, the further from the earths crust the lower the kinetic energy due to the gasparticles per 1cm3 bound by the electromagnetic field around earth. There are high a low and high pressure fronts in this atmosphere but the sum still 1. If you store air in a gascilinder the whole volume of earths atmosphere will be still 1.What goes in must go out as is acknowleged by some law of thermodynamics, energy can't be lost.

    You do have to see that energy in whatever it form it appears has nothing to do with forces due to the F= M x L.
    •  
      CommentAuthorexchemist
    • CommentTimeMay 3rd 2013
     
    Far from being "the basis of physics", the statement: "If you put kinetic energy on a surface it gives a force" is meaningless nonsense. Kinetic energy is a property of a MOVING BODY. It can't just exist by itself, so as to be "put" somewhere. The kinetic energy of WHAT?  
     
    Force = mass x length is also rubbish. As we all learnt at school, Newton's 2nd Law states: F = ma, that is Force = mass x acceleration, NOT "length.  
     
    You then go on to confuse metaphysics with meteorology, in course of which you manage to confuse gravity with electromagnetism.  
     
    It is plain that you lack any understanding of basic science.  
     
    This is the way to end up believing nonsense - and thereby making a fool of yourself.
    •  
      CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeMay 3rd 2013
     
    Lol, do you not understand this?
    Then are just to dumb nitwit.
    Bye.
    End of discussion!
    •  
      CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeMay 3rd 2013
     
    Exchemist, you are typing a bull load of shit.  
    All matter has an elektromagnetic mass, even if there is no acceleration.  
    As atoms , elektrons and so on have an electromagnetric polarity, their polarity is also their kinetic energy.  
    If you compress air the kinetic energy will raise linear with the contents inside /volume ratio.(mol)  
     
    Prof.Dr. H.Broeken (Universiteit Twente)  
     
    P.s, do not argue with me exchemist, it is way about your bedtime, or are you just trolling?  
    If you want to troll seek another site..........................
    •  
      CommentAuthorexchemist
    • CommentTimeMay 3rd 2013 edited
     
    Not trolling at all. However I do believe it is worthwhile to point out to readers of this forum where posts part company with good science.  
     
    I am perfectly content to let other readers judge the relative merits of what you say and what I say.  
     
    For what it's worth. there is no such thing as "electromagnetic mass" and "polarity" is not "kinetic energy". Everything you write appears to be complete twaddle.  
     
    And I can find no reference to any Prof Broeken at Twente University either. If you are quoting such a person or claiming to be him, kindly provide a verifiable reference.
    •  
      CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeMay 3rd 2013
     
    You & good science? Rofllolllllllllll
    Bye!
    •  
      CommentAuthorflange
    • CommentTimeJul 5th 2013
     
    Of course free energy is possible. See my post; Perpetual motion. You've nothing to lose, only gain, and it doesn't cost you a penny.  
     
    flange.
    •  
      CommentAuthordean
    • CommentTimeJul 17th 2013
     
    The best video I've seen on perpetual motion. Skeptics will be shocked and be in denial.  
     
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqG-TL0WnjE
    •  
      CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeMar 19th 2014
     
    From reading these forums I realise that the issue people seem to have with 'Free Energy' is how it seems to contradict the 'trade off' law. Thermodynamics is the process of converting one state to another and does not go against the principle of free energy. People are to focussed on a particular funtion or mechanism when it comes to the issue of energy. If you look at the entire universe as a function then you will realise that a thermodynamic standpoint becomes irelevant. As the universe is infinite so is energy and mass.
    •  
      CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeMay 21st 2014
     
    Free Energy is here and being developed by a team somewhere in Moracco. Here is the run down from the http://www.fixtheworldproject.net/quantum-energy-generator.html (copy and paste if you want, read, research, gain knowledge) website.

    Project Description
    The QEG is a crisp, clean, and modern device based on Tesla’s public domain design and built with incredible engineering precision (for example it has over 300 precision cut steel plates each at 18 ½ 1,000ths of an inch thick). The QEG is portable, the size of an average home generator, can easily hook up to your existing electrical system, and weighs approximately 120 pounds. The QEG can power your entire home, several of them can power anything from a skyscraper to a cruise ship, and you will never have to pay an electric bill ever again.

    The building of the QEG Prototype was Crowdfunded by 600+ people. The plans, instructions for building and user manual will be open sourced to the public in March of 2014. QEG manufacturing and distribution will commence via independent local Cottage Industry Community Units in 20+ countries.

    PLEASE BE SURE TO READ THE FIX THE WORLD QEG DISTRIBUTION GUIDELINES AND QEG MANAGING EXPECTATIONS

    QEG SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

    The Quantum Electric Generator system (QEG) is an adaptation of one of Nikola Tesla’s many patented electrical generator / dynamo / alternator designs. The particular patent referenced is No. 390,414, titled “Dynamo-Electric Machine”, and dated October 2, 1888.

    The QEG prototype is scaled to produce electrical power in the range of 10-15 kW (kilowatts) continuously, and can be wired to provide either 120 Volt or 230-240 Volt single phase output. We are also planning future designs to provide 3-phase power.
    Service life of the device is limited only by certain replaceable components, such as bearings, v-belts, and capacitors. The basic machine should operate trouble-free (with minimal maintenance) for as long as any good quality electro-mechanical appliance, such as a quality washing machine or refrigerator. Heavy-duty mechanical components are used throughout for reliability. The QEG is not a complicated device, as it is designed (like Tesla’s other ‘discoveries’), to work in harmony with natural laws, rather than with the power-wasting symmetric motor and generator designs used in today’s mainstream industry.

    An effective way to understand the operating principal of the QEG is to think of it as a high-powered self-resonant oscillator (what they used to call a ‘multivibrator’), adapted to transform high-voltage pulses (15 to 25kV) into line voltage AC output, at current levels up to 120A. In today’s alternative energy terminology, it would be a type of resonance machine.

    The circuitry that develops high power in this device is really based on an existing but under-utilized power oscillator configuration, however, the ‘quantum’ part of the design has to do with how the generator is started. Conventional alternators (AC generators) usually have a device called an ‘exciter coil’. This coil is usually a smaller, separate rotor winding that provides an AC voltage that is rectified and used to power the generator’s field coil(s).

    In the QEG, there is no internal, common exciter coil, and no rotor windings. In addition, to look at the circuit diagram, it is not apparent where the input power comes from to start resonance, and this is key; the QEG exciter coil is external to the generator, and the excitation signal is conducted through the quantum field (zero point) into the generator core, to start oscillation. Once the machine builds up to the resonant frequency, it powers itself (self running). James M. Robitaille​
    •  
      CommentAuthorbundibacsi
    • CommentTimeMay 24th 2014
     
    •  
      CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeNov 18th 2014
     
    Free energy is absolut possible. Moreover, we use this energy in all our electrolamps.

    Light is an one Form of Matter. The Matter cannot appear from absolut NOTHING. But, it appears from other Form of Matter. Which Form of Matter in our case from? Electrons? No. The current does not varied in contour. If 1 000 000 electrons enter in lamp through one conductor, these 1 000 000 electrons leave the lamp through other conductor. Then, which matter creats the light?

    Physical vacuum creats the light in our lamp. This vacuum has the very very very great energy - approximatelly 10(72) J/cub.meter. When the rotor revolves in electroengine, it deforms the structure of vacuum with the nonuniform movement (the revolving is nonuniform movement), delivers an work on the deforming and gives his energy to the Vacuum. And when electrons enter the lamp, they compel to vibrate the atoms in Filament of lamp very intensive, Vacuum reacts to these vibrations with the light Emission and give his energy back. If we find correct conditions, Vacuum can give back Energy 10, 100, 1000 times more.
    •  
      CommentAuthorjmccull68
    • CommentTimeNov 24th 2014
     
    Seems simpler to use the energy stored in a battery to power a DC compressor in order to srore energy in a.tank at high pressure, then release that energy to spin two 26" bicycle wheels mounted on a single axle with a belt around one running to a car alternator with a 3" pulley. 800 rpms on the wheels = over 6400 rpms at the alternator. Compressor only runs when pressure in tank drops from 200 psi down to 165 psi, but alternator spins continuously.  
     
    Add another wheel to the same axle to spin a different voltage generator for AC, or attach small inverter to the same battery that the compressor and alternator are connected to. Imagine using a 200amp alternator, or.....
    •  
      CommentAuthorDaS Energy
    • CommentTimeNov 26th 2014 edited
     
    tesla23: all the members who notice this topic please share any ideas... good, bad, stupid, brilliant, it doesnt matter... pls save the world.... because the corpocrats are not gona let the plans go public
     
     
     
    The 82% efficient hydro turbine (Francis) produces 720 watts for each litre at 9 bar pressure flow per second. This equates to 720KW at 9,000 bar pressure.  
     
    Captured Carbon-CO2 is fluid/liquid at +100*C and has a pressure of 10,000 bar. At+30*C it has a pressure of 70 bar.  
     
    CO2 readily absorbs heat from water.  
     
    One litre of water requires 0.076KW to raise the water temperature by +1*C in one minute. Or 4.56Kw to do so in one second.  
     
    To obtain an increase in water heating of +70*C in one second requires 320KW.  
     
    The water heating the CO2 as it passes through. Results in the CO2 heating by +70*C in one second.  
     
    The outcome of this is electrical heating of 320KW is required to heat the turbine drive fluid, which in turn spins the turbine/generator outputting 720KW.  
     
    Currently banned in Australia as it does not require burnt Coal for operation.
    •  
      CommentAuthorcavit
    • CommentTimeDec 4th 2014
     
    I do not know a way to convert vacuum structural energy in mechanical work, some of this energy is released at a black hole birth as a gamma ray burst, the vacuum inside of the collapsing core is converted into energy.  
    But vacuum is themodinamicallly exceptionally stable, even at a black hole birth only the vacuum inside the core is converted in energy.  
    There are some machines that pretend to transforme vacuum energy in mechanic work, but they are expansive, and the main streem oppnion is they are fake.  
    In this circumstance is not attractive to spend money on them.  
    I am interested to do this whith my wery own machine, my brain, I allready have it everywhere i go.  
    If somebody knows how to do this I am interested.
    •  
      CommentAuthorcavit
    • CommentTimeDec 4th 2014
     
    In my mind if such machine is created it must be a high energy rays radiator, which is not practicallly usable, only whith heavy shilding, heavier than a nuclear reactor
    •  
      CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeDec 12th 2014
     
    Cavit, these machine have no radiator. Radiator is need for thermal energy. But, free energy is not thermal form of energy. 5 years ago we have made such machine and it worked.
    •  
      CommentAuthorhandeler
    • CommentTimeMar 24th 2015
     
    I Got It and just found this site to post it. . . . Use Bouyancy and Gravity. Similar to Float Belt model. This is only perpetual motion model that has energy present at start (in form or molecules in motion in the water, and I count the locations of all the buoyant objects). But change a few things. The shape of the buoyant objects need to be a hybrid of L or V shaped. Therefore, as one comes into the water, the next one is laying inside of the one before it, keeping up a barrier to keep the water on its side. Using the air bubbles that come in with the objects. The flow then needs to go diagonal, not straight up. This increases our ratio of objects in the water to out. Alleviate the pressure, of piling up water molecules in front of the rising buoyant objects, by placing tunnel like exits for extra water to go into. This is where the fact that water molecules are always in motion comes to our advantage...we won't need to make the current go that way, it will just happen, and will create its own flow (because water will move away where molecules were at its thickest. Make sure design is crafty enough to not bottle neck: aka: where the water from these smaller tunnels reenter matters. After the objects have gotten to the top of their diagonal run, them and the air bubble rise out of the water, and then drop (all this is pipe-like), then reentering at the bottom to go back across, completing the X shaped route of the objects and the air current. Ingredients will matter too, almost as much as the contour of the walls which will affect the water current. *it may need a crank start since design will be made for objects and currents to be moving at their most efficient speed. *******Perpetual motion, By Joshua Vernon (if someone quotes thermodynamics, consider that extra heat energy can be moved to a second stage of the machine that uses that). The reason im posting instead of patenting, is because blue prints are not accepted by patent office in this category, only working models and I have no funding for building it. Thanks for reading, and hopefully, you make it happen. GL. HF. The currents + buoyant objects + falling objects ...made capable because moleucules move, we just needed to find the way to accelerate them....btw:doing so by designing a tank with pipes that send buoyant objects thru water with air bubbles and then reinsert them into water using a technique that minimizes resistance and keeps water on its side.....excess water that drops will get swept back in. [by x shaped route, I mean the objects and almost the entire air & water currents move diagonal and up, then come out of water and drop, then enter water and go other direction diagonally and up, then drop back down to repeat]
    •  
      CommentAuthorthat_prophet
    • CommentTimeJul 22nd 2015 edited
     
    Are you trying to tell me that if you put just a spark of DC electricity,  
    Into rotating a DC motor one single time,  
    With a 100cm circumference pulley attached,  
    With a belt on it that is big enough to encompass the 100cm pulley,  
    As well as 10 1cm circumference pulleys,  
    With AC motors-generators attached,  
    That the 10X100 = 1000 units of AC power,  
    When put through a full wave bridge rectifier,  
    Does not have the voltage to more than rotate your DC motor once  
     
    That is one spark of DC electricity in,  
    That gives you 1000 sparks of AC electricity
  2.  
    FREE ENERGY is here to stay  
     
    This is not gaining energy out of the air, or from nothing,  
    - but you are actually doing some converting (multiplying)  
    - the # of rotations with your different size pulley  
    - You are putting enough energy into a DC motor rotates a 100cm circumference pulley –(or as large as you like) one single  
     
    Then you are using a multiple of pulleys,  
    of varying sizes to multiply your  
    These motors take little to no torque to turn,  
    so we can easily use tens to hundreds of these pulleys,  
    to multiply our  
     
    We could do this for any voltage,  
    and start industries to manufacture  
    these power free electric generators in all of our electric tools + is SOOOOOOOOOOOO SIMPLE  
     
    these small pulleys have only motors on them  
    they have no resistance of movement, hence no torque  
    or practically none  
    you are just multiplying rotations  
    hence = multiply your AC electricity  
     
    and it has been staring us in the face  
     
    there is a powerful evil spiritual warfare going on here  
    blinding the most of us  
     
    this s True Free Energy  
     
    The only reason that this has not been used earlier to create free energy,  
    are the billions of fallen angels,  
     
    trying desperately make sure that we never discover this technology  
    Find out more at: DOOR FOR THE TRIBULATION TO START WILL CLOSE BEFORE 2020
    •  
      CommentAuthorRickG
    • CommentTimeJul 20th 2016
     
    A free energy motor running  
    https://youtu.be/etLPhs1ChAU
    •  
      CommentAuthorPmgu
    • CommentTimeJul 23rd 2016
     
    Please check out PMGU Perpetual Motion Generation Unit on youtube, im having a hard time proving this guys patent wrong
    •  
      CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeAug 13th 2016
     
    Free Energy is super simple  
    Yet, it is being hidden by evil spirits  
    I hope that after you see just how ridiculously simple this technology is,  
    That you will see through the spiritual fog,  
    Questioning how we missed this GEM of a free energy technology  
    - GEM = (Geometrical Electricity Multiplication) technology  
    Not finding it so hard to acknowledge that there is a real spiritual warfare  
    How else could we miss this simple + easy to produce free AC ELECTRICITY?  
     
    IN REALITY,,,,,  
    It is all done with wheels, or in this case variable sized pulleys  
    It uses a small “wheel in the middle of a wheel” that is large (Ezek 1:16)  
    Which is Ezekiel’s description of a working UFO motor mechanism  
    To put it in layman’s terms, you use pulley mechanics, to multiply # of rotations  
    Which in electronics terminology, is multiplying AC electricity  
     
    INPUT - expending one spark of DC current = electricity into a DC motor,  
    This one spark will rotate the DC motor one full rotation  
    If you attach a 100cm circumference pulley to this DC motor,  
    Then attached a longer than 100cm belt to this pulley,  
    You would gain 100cm of moving belt,  
    + have room to add a few mini-pulleys as your output  
     
    Which you would then run through 10 attached mini-pulleys,  
    Each mini-pulley has a 1cm circumferences,  
    If you then attached AC generators ,this gains you  
    OUTPUT - 10 X 100 = 1000 cycles of AC electricity  
    Thereby multiplying your one spark of DC electricity into 1000 sparks of AC electricity  
     
    There is no torque problems, as you are just using the AC generators  
    To wind up massive voltage,,, + torque only occurs when you generate power  
    Power being voltage times current  
    And the total amount of current that we need to generate  
    To make this GEM mechanism self powering, is one spark  
    Or practically zero current, hence practically zero torque  
     
    You can seemingly defeat the laws of thermodynamics,  
    By using the physical capabilities of rotating a large circumference pulley  
    To gain massive lengths of belt from a large circumference pulley  
    + then running that massive length through many mini-circumference pulleys  
    Thereby you are multiplying your rotations = multiplying AC
    •  
      CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeSep 12th 2016
     
    I'm curious to uncover out what weblog system youre employing? Im experiencing some small security problems with my latest weblog and Id like to locate something a lot more safeguarded. Do you have any recommendations? dfkekgafkckdbeef
    •  
      CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeOct 4th 2016
     
    I was looking through some of your blog posts on this internet site and I conceive this web site is rattling informative ! Keep on posting . ddcbddcdddfddcea
    •  
      CommentAuthorHandy andy
    • CommentTimeOct 26th 2016
     
    Dear Folks  
     
    Are you using the wrong term "free energy". Free energy implies the laws of thermodynamics are wrong, which if you believe in the big bang they are.  
     
    Perhaps chain reaction is more appropriate to what you are all hoping to achieve. Chain reactions happen in nature, thunder storms for instance. Fusion, Fision and Chemical reactions use chain reactions to produce heat. Gamma radiation is generated from thunder clouds. Gamma radiation happens when a proton decays to a neutron and positron, or when 2 hydrogen atoms fuse to form helium.  
     
    Many look towards Tesla and wardenclyffe, which behaved a bit like lightning. Water moisture can be ionized at low voltage, wardenclyffe would have ionized the moisture in the air around the tower. This would as any one would recognize produce ozone O3 and Hydrogen Etc. Hydrogen ions in ice conduct electricity according to current theory. Reducing air pressure will reduce the temperature, as seen at high altitude in clouds. P proportional to T. Ionization is a Redox reaction 2H2 + O2 - heat = 2H2O + heat assuming I have the reaction heat flow the right way around. The production of hydrogen will be increased at higher altitude by huge electrical fields in lightning reduced temperature and pressure etc.  
     
    Does the above sound interesting.
  3.  
    if you attach a 100cm circumference pulley to a DC motor  
    it only takes one spark of DC current to rotate a DC motor one full  
    this would give you 100cm of moving belt to work with  
    now if you run this length of moving belt past 1to10 mini  
    of one centimeter circumference with AC generators attached to each pulley  
    then you would get 100-1000 units or cycles of AC  
    these are free running AC generators=(as no load is on them)  
    -  
    all of these generators are running with zero load = no electricity being used  
    just the fluid friction of the bearings is your only wear or load-type  
    but you could use magnetic bearings + have zero friction  
    so all of these AC generators are just winding up massive voltage  
    which can be accessed as potential = ability to do work = available current in load  
    you have just made your first self powered set of running AC + DC generators  
    that you could tap power off of + the more mini-pulleys with AC generators attached  
    the greater amount of current you should be able to do work with don't you think that you could be able to get one spark of DC current)  
    ( out of the 1000 units of AC electricity that you have for an output)  
    (this would make this unit a self powering mechanism = perpetual motion)  
    (+ this could be producing an unknown amount of AC + DC = PUBLISHED 2001 OR 2002  
    (YET THERE IS SUCH A SPIRITUAL WARFARE GOING ON AGAINST IT)  
    ((( evil spirits were hiding this tech = lies about torque being a problem )))  
    -  
    Now comes the bad+scary part of this awesome free energy technology discovery  
    You can easily see just how super simple this AC multiplication technology is  
    so why could not any one of the millions of above average intelligence have discovered this  
    long as soon as AC electricity was Well this is hard positive proof  
    of there being powerful spiritual warfare going on all around + they were winning  
    I would say that these powerful evil forces were winning - if they could hide this from us  
    -  
    I happen to be Born Again-(28-11-88) + want this super simple free energy technology known  
    long before the first Door closes for Christ's return in the clouds by or before +  
    -  
    This technology is in the Holy Bible = in Ezekiel 1:16  
    where he is describing what a UFO motor looks like while it's running  
    so this technology will eventually lead us to anti-gravity  
    as well as not only speeds approaching the speed of light  
    but also the ability to do 1000 kph vectoring  
    -  
    We are warned that no one knows the day nor (Mat 24:36) but it says that we will know  
    when it is near to what? maybe the as we can know when it's"even at the doors"  
    (Mat 24:33) + I heard that in the original Greek it was worded like a command "know that it is near"  
    With this technology the Tribulation Saints can keep warm in our cold Canadian winters  
    even off the power (remember the heat + light of fires would easily give away  
    your position as well as via satellites)  
    -  
    notice that Doors are plural - because He show up twice =  
    1) - Rapture = "caught up together with the in the clouds"-(I Thes 4:17)  
    2) - "Glorious Appearing" at end of Tribulation -(Titus 2:13)  
     
    I DO NOT KNOW IF I BE THAT PROPHET OF THE BUT NOBODY ELSE IS SHOWING ( + there are less than 3 years left before the door shuts + Christ MUST come back ) ( + He has shown me a few Biblically significant things= 'I am" + 2020 Vision ) ( to find out more GOOGLE beliefstoliveby + yolasite = 30 + websites)
    •  
      CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeNov 20th 2016
     
    Ovver the course of the initial period, they began tto form grooup ffdgaabfdckekgef
    •  
      CommentAuthorGuest
    • CommentTimeJun 13th 2017
     
    I've been researching energy and electricity for over 25 years, and it is my belief that we do not understand how to use electricity properly. This specifically applies to the energy contained in a common DC battery, but is applicable to ALL electricity.

    Here is a specific, simple experiment, that anyone can do to see whether or not I am full of crap. Collect two 33000UF 50 volt capacitors and a grain of wheat bulb. Using batteries in series or a power supply, CAREFULLY charge one of the capacitors to 25 volts. Connect the second capacitor in parallel to the first. You will see that the two capacitors equalize in voltage. Now, connect the grain of wheat bulb to one of the capacitors, and carefully time how long the light remained lit. It should be approximately 13 seconds. Now connect it to the other bulb and time how long it stays lit. It should be approximately 13 seconds. You were able to light the bulb for 24 seconds TOTAL using the 25 volts you put in the capacitor.

    Now, make sure both capacitors are completely empty by shorting them out. Charge one of the capacitors to 25 volts again. Connect the negatives of the two capacitors together. Now CAREFULLY connect the two positives of the capacitors together using the grain of wheat bulb. Time how long the light is on. You will notice that the light is MUCH BRIGHTER than when just connected to one of the capacitors in the previous test. (Because you are running it on 25 volts instead of 12) When the light stops glowing, measure the voltage in each capacitor. You will see that the 25 volts is still ALL THERE, just evenly distributed between the two capacitors at 12.5 volts each. Now, connect the light to one of the capacitors and it will STILL take 13 seconds to use up all the energy in the capacitor. Connect to the second capacitor and it will still take 13 seconds to use up all the energy in the second capacitor. In this experiment you ran the same light off the same amount of energy, and when you total up the three times you ran electricity through the bulb, did it total to more than the 24 seconds in the first experiment? I'll bet money it DID. I will also bet that during the run between the positives the light was MUCH brighter. MUCH.

    Where did the extra energy come from? Is this free energy??? NO! NO! NO! We are simply USING the available energy in a different way. OK? Because NOW we are looking at the way we SHOULD have been using it all along. So here comes my theory. Most electrical devices DO NOT USE UP THE ELECTRICITY PUT INTO THEM WHEN PROPERLY CONNECTED. Think about that for a moment and what it means if I am correct.

    Focus for a moment on a standard DC battery. Here is what I believe "really" happens when you connect a load to that battery. It is an unbalanced system. There are more charges on one side of the battery than on the other, and when you measure the voltage in the battery, you are measuring the difference between one side of the battery and the other. When a load is connected, it gives a path for the energy to move from one side of the battery to the other THROUGH THE LOAD, WHICH BASICALLY RUNS FOR FREE until the battery is "balanced". At which point our meter reads zero voltage because there is no difference between the two sides.

    So how do we USE that energy without balancing out the two sides of the battery? It's pretty simple, and I have spent a lot of years working on the BEST way to do it. One of the coolest is a slight modification to an existing solar system which allows you to run many times longer on the same batteries, and double your load at the same time.

    I am not selling anything. Nothing. I have tried for 10 years to make this information available to people who are interested. I'm here to share, but ONLY with people who will take the time to do the simple experiment I have suggested and then will LISTEN and follow directions. Sorry to be a jerk, but I have had my fill of people who won't do the experiments telling me that what I have working on my bench doesn't work. Especially when there are two houses running on this system right now.
Add your comments